Fastpitch Recruiting Web Source

Archived Web Articles

Home page | Book | Article |FAQ with Cathi Aradi | Recruiting Updates

---

REMEMBMER, RULES AND GUIDELINES CHANGE REGULARLY.  IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, CHECK OUT THE RECRUITING UPDATES LINK, OR USE THE LINK ON THE INDEX PAGE TO ACCESS THE NCAA’S WEB SITE FOR CURRENT NCAA GUIDELINES.  IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RECRUITING PROCESS, YOU CAN ALSO EMAIL ME AT INFO@FASTPITCHRECRUITING.COM.

 

Archived Articles by Cathi Aradi

(All articles are © copyrighted from this web page and may only be reproduced with permission from the author.)

Please Note: These archived articles are reviewed periodically. However, any very recent change in recruiting or academic guidelines or even in recruiting trends may not be reflected if the article was originally written more than a year ago.

---

 

Sometimes the Truth Is a Bitter Pill to Swallow

 

The college search is a journey, and while many thousands of kids start the journey each year, 15 out of 20 will probably fall by the wayside. Some will decide they just don't care about softball any more; some will be prevented from playing by more important priorities. And many parents will "price" their player right out of the market. The ones I'm trying to reach are those who do have a bright and exciting future at some level of college softball, but who simply want to know how best to get there.  Parents and players need to understand the basic realities. That means turning a deaf ear to much of the verbiage they hear from other parents and even some travel or high school coaches.  Many parents will need to put aside their egos in order to: a) look at their daughter’s skills and needs as objectively as possible; and b) try to be keep focused on what is most important in this picture--e.g., getting a good education to prepare her for life in the real world.

 

Although many of you know these things, let’s look quickly at some basic facts:

§        There are about 1150 4-yr. college teams. 

§        Roughly 25% are Div. I; about 23% are Div. II and all the rest are D-III and NAIA.  (In other words, 75% of all collegiate players will not compete at a Div. I program!)

§        There's approximately a 70 to 30 ratio of private schools to public or state schools.

§        Sixty percent (60%) of all colleges are small—as in having student populations of 6000 or less.

§        Only about 55% of schools offer some type of "softball scholarships," and the vast majority that do will not give out very many (if any) full rides. (Those will usually go to major impact players--as determined by the coach, not the parents).

§        All schools with softball dollars are limited in how much they can give.

§        All scholarships must be renewed on a yearly basis. There is no such thing as a guaranteed 4 year ride. (College coaches always have the option of taking away athletic money at the end of any year. Most won't if your player is doing her job--but it is an option.)

§        90% or 9 out of 10 schools with teams are in states EAST of Colorado. That means only 10% of all college teams are in the west. Wyoming has no 4-yr schools with teams. Arizona, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Idaho, Montana and Hawaii have only a few college programs each. Oregon and Washington only have 5 D-I softball schools between them!  California has more than any other West region state, but HEY, GET REAL!!!  There are also a ton of very good players in the region.

 

            California athletes cannot afford to get too comfortable either. Take a look at which schools signed athletes this year and where those athletes are from.  You’ll see that strong players from other regions of the U.S. are taking away scholarships that might have been yours five to ten years ago! There are probably 70-80,000 graduating high school players every year. Some won’t want to play college ball. But if even 25% of them decide to see if they can make a college team, it presents ferocious competition because only about 4500 total spots on college teams open up each year.

 

Like it or not, because softball popularity has grown so much in the past ten years, kids who might have been "easy" recruits in the 1990’s now are having to work twice as hard to find a good school to recruit them. And unfortunately, it’s not always about how “good” a player is.  While the top 5% of all recruits--e.g., the big time, high visibility players from the very top travel teams in the nation--may still be fairly easily recruited because their numbers aren’t growing significantly every year, the remaining 95% of recruits have to be “noticed” in a pool of prospects that has become HUGE.

 

            Parents (bless their hearts) can (and should) be able to pick their player out of a group of 500 others even from a block away. But college coaches will just see this blob of players, and they will likely notice those with the most bells and whistles, the brightest colors, or who are jumping up and down and doing cartwheels. Does that mean those players are the best? Not at all. But they may be the best at getting noticed.

 

            Does Lady Luck play a role in this? Sure. We all know of someone who played the “game of her life” when a college coach was watching.  She got recruited and things seemed to work out almost magically.  And I keep buying lottery tickets every week because people do win.  (But I haven’t yet. And that’s not FAIR!!!  I really DESERVE to win!!!)  Your player may deserve to be recruited and given a scholarship.  But that’s not going to be good enough for most kids. College coaches are people too. They make mistakes.  And you can’t control those mistakes.  You can only prevent your own. 

 

            If I had a magic wand, I’d wave it over all the girls who come to me saying, “I want to play college ball.”  In two seconds, those who were passionately serious about this would turn green, and those who weren’t would turn orange.  Boy, would my job be a lot easier!  But alas, I don’t have that wand. So, what gets a player noticed by a coach? Leaving out that 5% of blue chippers and the 5% of kids who just happen to get lucky and looking at the other 90% of prospects, what gets a kid noticed is her determination to make coaches “see” her instead of some other player.  Whether it’s through sending out videos and making tons of follow-up phone calls to coaches who are likely to consider her an impact player, or by being able to come through with a “clutch” performance when coaches are watching, this kid is willing to put her money where her mouth is.  (In case you’re wondering, a “clutch” performance is one where you come through with the really big hit, the really big play or the really big pitching performance--and I mean big.)

 

            Competition is becoming so fierce (for spots on the “big name” teams at least), that players will have to be single-minded in their pursuit of excellence if they want to be considered by those “big name” programs.  And that means making sacrifices and possibly making some tough choices as well. College softball recruiting is a game of musical chairs.  There are only so many seats available and when the music starts to slow down, you’d better grab a chair or you may be out of the game.  There is good news in all of this, however.  At least at the moment, kids who are willing to consider schools other than the Top 25 Div. I programs; kids who are willing to look at schools that are Div. II, III or NAIA; and kids who are willing to travel (if they’re in the west) have a much better chance of finding a college to recruit them than those kids who won’t do any of the above.

 

            Life is often tough.  Sometimes it really stinks.  And it’s almost never fair.  Well, recruiting is just like life.  But a cup that’s half full still holds a lot of water.  And athletes who really want to play in college can make it happen if they understand the game and are willing to do what it takes to win.  They need the support of their parents and coaches, and these people must stay grounded and live in the real world.   We’re talking about teenagers here.  Unless they are exceptionally motivated and focused, most of them cannot do this alone.  So if parents just sit back and wait for it to happen...if parents spend all their time talking about how Washington and UCLA and Michigan are sure to recruit their kid...then they have no one to blame but themselves when this doesn’t happen.

 

            I would, of course, wish for all kids that their “dream schools” would recruit them.  But more than that, I would wish for every would-be college player, a good school with a caring coach and a decent team to offer her spot where she can play and make a genuine contribution. Ten years from now, no one will give a hoot that most of these kids played college ball--let alone care where they played it.  Employers look at things like team work, work ethic, commitment to excellence, willingness to make sacrifices, an understanding of the real world, and oh yes, whether or not the prospective employee has the education (and experience) she needs to prepare her for this job.  Funny, but that sounds a lot like what college coaches are looking for in their recruits!

 

* * *

“IF THAT IS THE RULE, HOW CAN THIS HAPPEN?”

 

This article is a follow up to a previous article which was entitled, "But I Didn't Know That Was the Rule!"  (It examined various NCAA recruiting rules that parents tend to ignore or be unaware of.)   That article also ran on StudentSportsSoftball.com, and I received a fair number of emails from readers, all of whom asked the same question: “If college coaches can’t talk to players until after their junior year, how are so many juniors and even sophomores making verbal commitments to teams?”


I’m going to address the rule portion of this question, and then do a bit of editorializing about the issue itself.  The NCAA rules state that college coaches may not have face to face contacts (meetings) with players (or their families) off campus until after the player completes her junior year.  (June 15th for Div. II coaches; July 1 for Div. I.)  That means until those dates, college coaches can’t phone you or talk to you at tournaments or games, visit your home, have dinner with your family, etc.  And “official” or paid for visits are not allowed until after you start your senior year.

 

Coaches may, however, email or write juniors and send sophomores a questionnaire in response to a player’s letter.  There are also no rules that prohibit players from visiting college campuses at their own expense.  Once there, they can meet with the team coaches.  There are some distinctly “gray” areas within the NCAA rules that touch upon discussing scholarships and so on, but there are ways “around” these gray areas.


So when you see that a player has made a verbal commitment to a college before starting her senior year—e.g., before the time she could even take an official visit—here’s generally how that comes about.  In virtually all cases, a college coach has seen the player in action at tournaments, probably playing for a fairly high visibility travel team.  This player might be playing on a top ASA gold team as a freshman or sophomore and performing very successfully at the level of the older players.


The college coach will then usually let the player’s travel coach know that he or she is very interested in hearing from the player.  (Obviously, if the player has started her junior year, the coach could be emailing or sending letters to her as well.)  The player or her parent would probably then call the coach and set up an unofficial visit to the campus.  (Coaches cannot call you until after that July 1st or June 15th date, but you may call them at any time.  They just won’t be able to return your calls.)


Remember, NCAA rules permit you to visit a college unofficially whenever you want, so as long as the family pays all the costs of the visit, the college coach is free to meet with this player, have her tour the campus, perhaps meet with current players and so on.  You will find coaches may be a bit vague on how they work out the “details” of an early commitment, but the truth is that it’s been happening in “revenue” sports for quite a while, and it appears to be a trend at the top level of collegiate softball too.


With that said, however, I am not alone in my opinion that the NCAA should consider some sort of ban on early commitments, or failing that drastic move, they should set up some sort of oversight process.  I happen to think it’s hard for most 15 or 16 year olds to understand the commitment required to play college softball.  Since I find many young adults aren’t sure what they want to do this coming weekend, let alone a year from now, it may be asking a lot to expect them to know what will be best for them in terms of a college experience two or three years from now.  It’s easy to “wow” a player (or her parents) with 100,000 people at a football game, the prospect of a National Championship, and promises of a paid-for education, but that’s not the same as really experiencing college life and the demands of college athletics (particularly at a Top 20 program).


Believe it or not, a lot of college coaches agree with me, and there is some talk that the NCAA may take a closer look at this issue.  There are many reasons why it would be hard to ban it, but I hope something can be done.  It certainly gives an edge to those coaches who have the resources to identify or connect with players early, and it puts a ton of pressure on those who don’t.  It also places a lot of unnecessary pressure on families.  Those players who may be smart enough to know they’re not ready to make this decision as a 15 or 16 year old may feel they’re going to miss all the good opportunities.  Some young athletes will almost certainly make the wrong choices (for them) simply because they were afraid they would lose out if they didn’t.  And some parents are so impressed by the prospect of a big scholarship that they would (in effect) say, “To heck with sound parental judgment.  Show me the money!”


On another note, however, it is critical that parents and players understand one important fact about the early commitment process.  Although these commitments get a lot of coverage on Student Sports Softball.com, Spy Softball.com and so on, the reality is that this group of students (and the schools they commit to) represent a very small percentage of the overall number of players in a given class of graduates.  So when you read about these commitments, remember that there will still be hundreds of college coaches looking for good players when you are finishing your junior year in high school. 


The only aspect of this issue that you may want to pay attention to is the type of colleges that get these early commitments.  For the most part, it tends to be the bigger name, higher visibility Div. I schools that follow this path.  Because of that, it may be that writing a Top 20 D-I program at the end of your junior year will be a waste of valuable time.  Remember, about 100 players a year will go to these teams, and 75% of all college players will be at Div. II,
III or NAIA schools.  So if you know that Arizona or UCLA are done recruiting 2013 graduates, why not send your video to a school that may still be actively looking?  Why not increase your chances of being recruited by focusing on those schools that would be excited to hear from you and not bother pursuing those teams that already have their commitments for next year?


Remember, this is just my opinion, and I know some folks will disagree.  But theoretically, much of what the NCAA does is designed to keep collegiate athletics fair and honest and to protect both college athletic programs and young prospects as well.  I hope they can manage to do that with this very controversial issue!

 

* * *

Understanding Different Recruiting Styles

In my work with college-bound student-athletes, I often hear that parents and players are puzzled or frustrated by the way college coaches recruit. It’s not hard to understand this confusion when you consider there are over 1100 four-year teams, three NCAA Divisions, the NAIA, and junior colleges; and they all have their own rules and recruiting timetables. In this article, I want to help families become better prepared for the recruiting process by looking at some of the differences in how coaches recruit.

I’ll start with some generalizations that apply to all types of colleges. First, it's important to remember that coaches are people too! Each has his or her own personality--and that's bound to affect how they recruit. Some coaches may be outgoing, like to talk on the phone, communicate well with strangers, etc. Others may be quiet, even shy, and perhaps feel more comfortable showing skills, running practices or planning game strategies.

These individual differences can affect the way a school recruits you. The head coach may leave 90% of the recruiting to an assistant coach. Or the head coach may do it all himself. The coach who does most of the recruiting may hate phone calls, or hate email, or not be great at time management, often leaving recruiting to the end of the day or putting it off until tomorrow or next week. Some coaches communicate better with adults than teens; others will be just the opposite. One coach may feel touching base with a recruit once a month is plenty; another may want to talk to you every couple of weeks; a third might email you several times a week once the process actually gets underway.

My point is that you need to keep these personal, philosophical and style differences in mind when you start communicating with college coaches or they with you. I sometimes hear families are upset because a coach isn’t attentive enough or because a coach said she would call, then didn’t. I always favor the proactive approach—i.e., if you want to find out why something did or did not happen, go to the source. So if a coach says he’ll call, and then doesn’t follow through, there’s no reason you can’t call him.

I’m a huge believer in moving the process along if at all possible. Don’t sit around and wait for answers if you can go out and get them! Since most coaches recruit several players at any given time, it may be a big mistake to take anything for granted. Rule number one is this: If you have questions about what a coach is doing or why she’s doing it, ASK! But remember, it's unfair to expect every college coach to be the same in how he or she recruits, (not to mention how they view your skills, your experience, and your potential to contribute to their program!)

(Note: It's also very helpful to understand all the NCAA and NAIA rules on contacts and recruiting as they differ not only from each other, but within each division! For example, if you know that D-I and D-II coaches may only phone you once a week, you're less likely to be upset if a coach calls, talks to mom for ten minutes then doesn't call you back for the rest of that week.)

Now let’s look at some of the major differences in recruiting based on the differences in programs. There are always exceptions, but these are general trends I’ve observed over a number of years.

I sometimes hear parents or players complain that while many of the Div. I schools they’ve written have responded (if only with a form letter), the D-II or NAIA coaches haven’t sent word one in reply. This is not unusual, because there are often notable differences in both style and timing of recruiting--e.g., from D-I, to D-II, from NAIA to D-III, recruiting will not be the same.

And even within divisions, there will be differences. For example, I tend to find that the bigger the D-I program, the more likely you are to get a quick response. Big schools with well-funded teams are more likely to have a full-time staff, and their coaches often spend a lot of time on recruiting. They may have an established routine—e.g., letters and videos are opened, time-dated, examined and then responded to following a specific schedule. In many cases, if you send a letter to one of these programs, you’ll likely get an answer back within a month or two. Coaches at the bigger Div. I programs may start tracking prospects earlier, they may initiate contact earlier, and they may make recruiting decisions earlier. Families are sometimes surprised when their athlete gets a letter telling her a school has finished recruiting—and it’s only August!

This may, of course, be just a form response and a nice way of saying, "Thanks, but we’re not interested." However, it may also be true. A school that identifies top prospects early in a given class, starts writing those prospects as juniors, has them on campus for unofficial visits, talks to them in person at the first allowable date, and so on, may indeed get commitments by the end of summer or start of fall.

Statistically speaking, however, this is unusual. Many Div. I coaches will not even finalize their "short list" of recruits until late summer or early fall, and some will still be looking for prospects after the fall tournaments conclude. At smaller D-I schools where the coach may not even have a full time assistant, it may take longer for you to hear back, and you may have to follow up with a phone call. Still, most D-I programs will try to have their recruiting wrapped up, with commitments in hand, by late winter or early spring. So unless a team member gets injured or leaves the program, or an unexpected need arises, you can typically expect D-I coaches to be done recruiting and looking ahead to scouting next year’s prospects when summer starts.

The timetable at other levels of competition may be different, however. Coaches at well-established D-II, D-III or NAIA programs—e.g., those with good staffing, good funding, etc.—may start looking at juniors in late spring or early summer, assuming their current recruiting needs have been met. But it’s also not unusual for these coaches to do very little recruiting until the fall. If they have travel budgets that allow them to travel for scouting over the summer, they may try to see kids who’ve written them. And some may begin follow-up contact right away, trying to schedule visits and looking at fall commitments. But, many D-II and NAIA coaches, since they are permitted to have players on campus for workouts, will not have much contact with players until they’re ready to schedule those tryout dates.

I've even heard from NAIA and D-III coaches that they like to wait until the first "crush" is over. Some have told me that they want to know the players are really willing to consider their schools—e.g., they've adjusted their expectations after the big D-I programs have turned them down. So these coaches may put off a lot of their active recruiting until the end of the fall, after the early signing period is over.

Another factor in the recruiting timetable is money. Since D-II and NAIA coaches may have some scholarship money to offer prospects, they may be more interested in getting commitments earlier than Div. III coaches. The D-III coaches will not be offering athletic-based aid, so they know players may not make their final decisions until after they've been accepted and gotten their financial aid offers. Consequently, it may be spring before Div. III coaches get most of their commitments.

Coaches at smaller programs generally have smaller staffs, and they may not be as efficient at responding to letters and videos. If you’re looking at these types of schools, your pursuit of their programs may be more important than their pursuit of you. While these coaches might not respond as quickly, they may appreciate your phone calls even more than coaches at big schools would. If you’re really interested in a particular team, pick up the phone and let the coach know it! Request a visit, ask about applying, and keep calling until you get an answer.

Once you get to the fall of your senior year, you should begin seeing results from your marketing efforts. D-I coaches can start returning your calls once you've passed July 1 following your junior year, so here's an important guideline. If it's September, and you’ve sent a video to a big college program, called and left several detailed messages, and no one has returned your calls, it's probably safe to assume they're not interested at this time.

Keeping in mind that D-II or NAIA coaches may be setting up workouts with prospects, and you should also start calling these coaches once fall comes. But you might want to keep calling (particularly if you think they'll be able to see you play fall ball), and perhaps try again after the first of the year before you scratch them off your list. If you’re writing a lot of Div. III coaches, you may see even later recruiting responses. So don’t assume they’re not interested just because they haven’t written you. Just keep calling.

With so much competition out there, and with recruiting styles and schedules so dependent on the type of college as well as the type of coach, you should be very proactive. Look at each college you’re contacting, and consider the factors that might affect when or how that coach responds to you. Then make your follow up calls and stick with it until you get an answer—even if that answer is no. While that big Div. I college might be done recruiting in September, the odds are great that there’s some other coach, be it at a Div. II, III, NAIA, or even another D-I school, who would love to have you as a member of his or her team!

* * *

WHAT DO YOU DO IF YOU DON'T "SIGN" EARLY?

In the sport of softball, NCAA Division I and II colleges are allowed to have an early signing period for one week in November, and a surprising number of people think that if you don't sign then, it's all over. Many families aren't even aware that there is a "traditional" signing period which runs from mid-April all the way through July. (Division III colleges never have a "signing" period since they don't offer athletic-based aid, and NAIA schools sign their own individual commitment letters and do not use the National Letter of Intent.)

Seniors and their parents often get caught up in an early signing frenzy, believing that if they don't actually sign in November, there won't be any colleges left to recruit them. Most would be surprised to learn that if you took all players who will eventually sign at or commit to play at a college somewhere--including D-III and NAIA schools--you would find that the majority of athletes do not sign in the fall. Even if you just looked at players who will sign at a D-I or D-II at some point, I suspect that you'd still find nearly half did not sign in November.

It is probably true that many "high visibility" players--e.g., the top D-I prospects, kids on well-known travel teams, etc.--will sign in November. But they only represent a portion of the overall total. Of course, since many of these top prospects will choose bigger name colleges, those particular teams may well be out of the recruiting loop after November. But every year I find lots of college coaches still looking well into the spring--some even into the summer.

I think early signing is great for the player who finds a terrific school and team "fit" and whose family can work with the financial aid offered by that particular school. However, those players who don't sign early should not look for the nearest tall bridge to jump off of. As the old baseball saying goes, "It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings," and she's not even warming up yet!

But what if you don't find the right school in the fall or you got a late start on your college search? First of all, be sure you have several "Plan B" schools to which you apply following their regular application deadlines. Whether it is a local school, a school where you wouldn't play softball, or one where you'd try out as a walk-on player, you need to have a college to attend. (Of course, some players will decide college softball may not be right for them after all, so they'll need a back-up school for sure!)

Once you've gotten those applications out of the way, take a new look at your goals vis-à-vis college ball, and try to decide how realistic those goals are. If you were shooting for Alabama or Fresno State, chances are they're done recruiting, and while you can call the coach to find out for sure, you may want to take most of the "big name" college teams off your list if they're not calling you.

If you have been emailing or talking with coaches, November is the time to really pin them down. You need to find out if they are done recruiting or are still looking. If still looking, do they consider you a strong prospect? If you are someone they want to recruit, try to set up a visit--if not before Christmas, then after the first of the year.

If you aren't getting much response from the schools you initially pursued, consider contacting some new schools. But think about focusing on Div. II, III, NAIA or Junior Colleges, since these schools often start recruiting later than the bigger programs, and they may still be looking. It's also good to remember you can go work out with a JC or NAIA program at any time during your college search, but you can only work out with a Div. II team until you start the semester in which you play high school softball. (If you don't play HS ball for some reason, this limitation does not apply.)

All colleges play in the spring, so between practices, home games and road trips, many of these coaches will have limited time in which to bring you in for a visit. The same thing will apply to you if you live in a state that plays spring high school ball. So it's smart to get on a coach's radar early--preferably in January--to allow you to find a time to visit--and possibly work out--that works for both of you.

Don't be afraid to call coaches; just be sure if you get voice mail, you leave a detailed message--including your grad year--so they return your call. I hear from a lot of kids that they're afraid to bother coaches, don't want the coach to get angry, don't know what to say, etc. In my experience, most coaches are very happy to talk with a player. You need to find out whether there's a chance you can play at that school, and any information you get will be useful. If a coach says, "Thanks, but we're done," at least you know to move on. (As a side note, if you call a coach three or four times, leaving a message each time, and that coach doesn't call you back, chances are good you can take that school off your list.)

I have seen players stick to their college search with dogged determination, through the winter, into the spring and even into the summer. And it's almost always paid off if only because most other kids gave up! Granted, most of the time, successfully finding a college will mean adjusting your expectations to fit your reality--and for some kids and parents, that's impossible. But for those who truly want to play in college, if you are open to lots of options, keep plugging away, and don't give up, you have a terrific chance of finding a college that says, "We want you!"

* * *

West Coast Players...Beware of Complacency!

Five to ten years ago, if you were a West Coast ball player who had good competitive experience, you could probably expect to beat out players from almost any other part of the country when it came to recruiting.  Most of the "big name" programs east of Colorado eagerly scouted West Coast players in general and Southern California athletes in particular.   West region kids from strong ASA teams who were willing to look outside the state could almost write their own tickets.  I even saw college coaches recruit players who weren't necessarily top athletes just because they were from California

But the times they are a-changin'!  Or rather they have changed.  The National Fastpitch Coaches Association's newspaper, Fastpitch Delivery, publishes signings/commitments several times during the year, and what has fascinated me for the past few years is how most of the signed players  are not from the West. Almost all players who signed were from the region or state in which the school was located and not from the West Coast (except, of course, those committing to Western schools). 

I cannot stress this enough.  Each list doesn't include every player who signed/committed at every school so far.  But they are representative, and on the whole, there usually aren't a lot of West Coast players being signed by schools outside the West.  There might be one or two in a group of five or six signers at some schools, but many of the schools--D-I and D-II--had no players listed who were from states west of Colorado.  This WILL impact you...there is just no getting around this.

So what exactly does this mean to you if you're a West region recruit?  Well, for one thing it means you'd better not take anything for granted when it comes to your college search.  Sure, if you're the starting shortstop on a team that finishes in the top ten at Gold Nationals every year, you're probably still going to have a lot of good Div. I colleges interested in you--assuming grades, attitude, etc., are on par with your athletic ability and experience.
 
But what I see happening more often now is players who are from good--but not necessarily  top West Coast teams--finding themselves late in their senior year with no college to call home.   I get panicked calls and emails from parents all the time asking me to tell them what they should do now?  Sometimes they have done virtually nothing--no letters to colleges, no video, etc.--because their travel coach told them he would take care of the player.  Sometimes they've sent out letters, maybe even videos, and they've gotten lots of "interest," but no one has actually said, "We're actively recruiting you; let's set up a visit."  And they've just waited, and waited, and waited....then waited some more for active recruiting to start.

Players from the West are often stunned when I tell them that 90% of all college teams (and therefore 90% of all college players) are at schools that are east of Colorado.  And when you combine that statistic with the fact that 75% of all teams are at Div. II, Div. III or NAIA schools, all of a sudden, you find there just aren'tthat many options on the West Coast.  And when you consider that many of the Div. I teams in the West are powerhouse programs, suddenly getting recruited or getting a scholarship here becomes a whole lot harder. 

We have tons of excellent softball players from Washington to Arizona.  But there just aren't that many colleges--even for the smart kids who will consider different types of programs--D-II, NAIA, D-III

Whereas six or seven years ago a big program like Michigan or Florida State might have signed half their recruits from the West, suddenly they're now looking at kids from Texas and Florida and Missouri.  So it's not just that competition for spots on West Coast teams is getting tougher.  Competition for spots everywhere is much tougher.  And this "trickles down" to smaller schools as well, though usually in a positive way for them.

West Coast players who would not have even considered a D-II or NAIA school in Kansas or South Carolina five or six years ago are now having to eagerly pursue these programs, particularly if they're hoping to get some scholarship money.  And West region D-II, NAIA and D-III teams are benefiting as well from the abundance of local talent.  It's no surprise that schools like Chapman or Linfield at the D-III level and Cal Baptist or Pt. Loma Nazarene at the NAIA level have become perennial powerhouses.  And the CCAA--the D-II conference in California--is considered one of the toughest and most competitive in the whole country.

My advice to West region ball players who are determined to have a collegiate career is this:

*      Be as open as you can be.  That includes looking at different regions of the country, different types of colleges, and different ways to pay for your college

*      Don't assume anything.  If your coach says he or she will "take care of it for you," you'd better say, "Thanks--any help you can give will be awesome, but I'm in charge of my college search."

*      Be prepared to adjust your expectations to fit your reality.  Staying on the West Coast may mean not getting scholarship money or it may mean playing at an NAIA program rather than at a Div. I school.

*      When you start your college search, do not just write the top 20 Div. I programs in the country.  Write a bunch of smaller D-I's, D-II's, NAIA's and some D-III's as well.  Don't wait for the big schools to say, "No Thanks!" before contacting other programs.  If you do, you may find those schools have already identified their prospects, and you're just plain out of luck.  This goes back to the email I sent you a couple of weeks ago about "perspective."  Many smart recruits will soon figure out that they  might as well not bother writing UCLA or  Arizona State or  Texas A& M.  They should head right for those schools where the coaches are almost certain to go "Wow!" when they get their video and packet!

*      I have found that while more D-I schools are recruiting regionally, more D-II and NAIA and even D-III schools will respond to inquiries from West Coast players than they ever would in the past.  So there's still the chance for you to find a great competitive college team.  It just might not be at the D-I level.

*      Be proactive.  Until a coach calls you and asks you to come for a visit--giving you specific dates--you should not take her interest for granted.  Make your follow-up phone calls, and show coaches how interested you really are.  Whether they're in Kentucky, Kansas or California, you need to let them know you're serious about their programs.  And if they're not responding....move on.  (This will really be true for you once summer is over.)

If you have excellent competitive experience, that's a real plus.  But for most athletes, this alone by itself is not going to get you recruited.  If you're not willing to put yourself out there, market yourself, and prove to coaches you really want to play in college, just remember, there are kids in Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and Texas who are more than willing to take your spot on the collegiate field!  And it's a lot easier for coaches to see these players at local and regional tournaments!  The moral of this story is...if you insist on "holding out"--for a big name school or a D-I school or a big scholarship---you may be left holding the bag!

* * *

HOW MUCH DO YOU REALLY WANT TO PLAY IN COLLEGE?

I wish there was some way I could 'plug in' to parents' and players' heads and transfer my recruiting experience and knowledge directly to that part of the brain that is responsible for decision-making. Because no matter how much I talk, many kids and parents still don't quite 'get it.' (And that's understandable given all the misinformation that floats around the ball park!)

It is true that there are a few travel teams who garner so much attention from college coaches that their top players really don't have to do much other than play well to get recruiting offers. But these kids represent a small percentage of the total number of prospects. The vast majority of kids will probably have to work very hard if they want to find a college and a team. They and their parents simply cannot make the mistake of assuming they/their daughter will be 'snapped' up by college coaches just because she was All-League in high school or because she hit two home runs last summer. They simply cannot sit back and wait for the phone to ring.

When talking to coaches about the college search process and recruiting, it has become increasingly evident to me that many college coaches are simply overwhelmed. They not only cannot see--let alone discover--every player out there, but many of them can't even get through the mail on their desk! A coach who has 40 videos sitting in front of her may look at fifteen of them and find three players she likes enough to call, go see play, etc. Because of that, she may discover, recruit and sign a player long before she ever gets to tape number 37--which happens to be your daughter's tape.

Several coaches told me recently that while the video is critical in getting them to consider a player (particularly if they can't see her in person), follow-up was equally important. One coach told me she had sent out about 50 requests for videos to kids. Of the 30 or 35 players who actually sent tapes back only four or five called to follow-up--e.g., to ask if she'd gotten the tape and to find out where she stood with recruiting. This coach said she paid a lot more attention to those four or five kids because of their phone calls. It definitely made a difference in her response to a player if she knew that player was so interested that she would make the effort to call--no matter how scary that phone call might be!

Most coaches don't mind if parents call unless they sense the parent is doing a 'hard sell.' But almost all coaches like it when a player is brave or confident enough to call them herself. It tells them a lot about her desire to play in college.

I will acknowledge that some college coaches are too busy (or too disorganized) to return a phone call or, in lieu of a call, to send a letter saying, 'Thanks, but we're not interested.' So as disappointing as it may be, I usually tell an athlete if she calls a coach three times over a couple of weeks and the coach just ignores those calls, it's time to move on to other schools.

It's also good to keep in mind that at many of the 'big name' programs, they have secretarial staffs to write nice letters and handle PR for them. I often hear that a player has gotten a gracious letter from the #1 or #2 or #4 school in the nation saying, 'You're a fine athlete. If you decide you want to attend our college, please let us know. We'd be happy to have you try out as a walk-on....etc., etc.'

Yet I may also know the odds on this player making the team--forget starting--at that school are very slim. I know the coach at that school. He or she has signed four seniors from nationally- known travel teams, and he or she will have twenty kids trying out as walk-ons, including several more players from those same big name travel teams. He or she will keep two or three, and the rest of the kids will get cut. It's a business and that's how it's run. But the school's or team's image is important too, and no one wants to deliberately hurt a player's feelings. Hence the nice letters welcoming you to walk on.

I've had many parents complain about some coach who wrote their daughter a blunt 'rejection' letter. And they'll often contrast that with the 'big name' school coach who sent a lovely letter saying she was welcome to try out as a walk-on. Personally, if I was the parent of a player who passionately loved the game and who really wanted to play, I would much rather a coach tell me the kid wouldn't make the team than lead me on.

Sure, she's welcome to try out. But at that point, she's already chosen the college, enrolled, moved to the school and turned down other colleges where she could really play. Now if playing softball isn't that important, but attending Oklahoma State or Michigan State or Arizona State is, that's fine. Go to school there, have a great college life, and if you have to give up softball, so be it.

But if your athlete really, really wants to play, you can find a team that will give her that opportunity even if it's not the #1 team in the nation. Believe me, there are lots of coaches at smaller programs out there who love to hear from a player who's interested in their school.

Five or ten years ago, if you just wrote a coach and maybe sent a video, you had a good chance that the coach would try to see you play or would respond to your letter at the very least. That's not enough any more. There are just too many kids in the mix. You almost have to do something that makes you stand out. Obviously, it's terrific if you can do this on the field during a game when a coach is watching you. But it also helps if you are willing to try to sell your love of softball to a coach.

That's where the phone calls come in. Coaches know how hard this is for you, but they are more likely to take you seriously because it is so hard. So is college softball! Make that effort, take the chance. You may get turned down; that's part of life. But you may also steal a spot on a team away from another player who couldn't or wouldn't make pick up the phone!

* * *

HOW TO WIN THE RECRUITING LOTTERY

With each passing recruiting year, I see proof of softball's growth at the youth level. More high school and travel teams are becoming competitive, and the/re's a definite increase in the number of student-athletes who are dreaming of playing softball in college.

Softball talent, just like softball teams--college and youth ball--tends to fall into a pyramid shape; and I don't expect this to change. Just as there will always be more average players than there will be Lisa Fernandez or Michelle Smith types, there will always be fewer college teams at the top and a lot more in the middle and at the bottom of this pyramid. But the overall level of college team competitiveness is rising every year. This is due to better coaching, better equipment and technology, better experience and a bigger and better pool of talent to draw from.

Players who five or six years ago might have walked onto many Div. I teams and been guaranteed a spot are now scrambling to get themselves recruited. Last spring, I saw many families on the brink of despair because their athlete didn't have a school offering her money or even a starting spot. Granted, many of these families had been sitting around "waiting" for it to happen--e.g., they assumed coaches would find their player and recruit her just because she was a strong athlete. But there were also players struggling to find spots who had written colleges, had sent out videos, and had tried to let coaches know they wanted to play in college.

The process of finding a college is much like finding a job, and the tighter the job market, the more you have to work. I know the process as I outline it in my book works. Proactive marketing, contacting coaches, sending out videos, and never stopping does produce results. But I also have to warn parents that because of the pyramid structure of college softball, there will be far fewer spots open at top schools and far more players wanting to go to those schools. And the bigger the talent pool, the more coaches can pick and choose which kids they want to recruit.

It has become more important than ever to identify your athlete's "target zone" early in the recruiting process. In the "old" days, players could write five or ten schools, and if those schools weren't interested, they could then write another five or ten, gradually working their way down the list until they found schools where they would be "impact" players. (The key to being recruited as a player is to find the school where you will make a difference.) Now, many families take way too long to do this. Where players think they can play and would like to play may not be where they are most likely to make a strong contribution to the program and therefore be a "hot prospect."

I try not to discourage players by telling them they are unlikely to be recruited by Fresno State or Washington or Oklahoma or UCLA. It's fine to contact your "dream" schools. Just do it early in your college search, and at the same time also write twenty or thirty other schools covering a broad spectrum from small and mid-level Div. I schools to good Div. III programs.

In my experience, it's a lot easier to hear that a Top 20 Div. I team doesn't want to recruit you, if at the same time, you are hearing that a smaller D-I or good D-II/NAIA school has a spot just for you. Yet, many kids (or their parents) would rather risk giving up softball than approach schools that aren't "big name" programs.

As you're sitting around waiting for a coach to call think of these numbers. Every fall, roughly 3500 to 4000 young women will enter four-year colleges as new recruits destined for the softball team. Of this total number, 75% will go to play for Div. II, Div. III and NAIA college teams, and 90% will be going to schools that are located east of the state of Colorado! Of this total number, only about 50% will get any softball-based aid. (Players may get lots of other kinds of financial aid, but a lot of students will not be signing a National Letter of Intent.) And, finally, of the above total number only about 75 to 100 athletes will go to Top 20 Div. I teams. (This means three or four kids a year will go to an Arizona or a Michigan.)

Too many parents waste time insisting that their player is in the elite "blue chip" pool of recruits, when in reality she's in the much, much larger pool of "very good" athletes. Because of this, these families take too long to realize that their player may have to accept a Div. II scholarship or an NAIA talent award or a Div. III financial aid package if she really wants to play softball in college.

I would certainly never recommend that a player go to a college she hates just to play softball. This is always a big mistake. But I do urge athletes to expand their horizons and consider colleges they might not have heard about or colleges that are farther away from home than they originally wanted. College coaches do want the best talent they can get. But almost all coaches will take a long hard look at the player who most wants to play and who really wants to be part of their program. So the more open an athlete is and the more willing she is to take a look at lots of different types of colleges and college teams, the greater are her chances of being some coach's "dream" recruit.

The recruiting game is like the game of musical chairs. There are way too many players competing for too few seats. If the music starts to slow down, you had better grab the first open chair. If you don't you may find you are out of the game all together!

* * *

SOFTBALL "WINDOWS OF OPPORTUNITY"

The way a family approaches the college search process is based on a lot of things, not the least of which is the athlete's commitment to finding the team and school that are right for her. Some families are very "gung ho," wanting to write colleges when the player is a freshman or sophomore. Others are more laid back or perhaps take a lot for granted--e.g., they are pretty sure their athlete will just be "discovered," recruited and signed. In any case, they often wait until her senior year before panicking and rushing to send out letters and tapes.

Is there a right answer to the question of when to start the college search? Technically, there isn't. You can get lots of different input from coaches--travel, college, high school, etc. While it's true that a few college programs may spot young players they want to watch, there's a catch there. They want to identify the next Lisa Fernandez or Cat Osterman--e.g., the next phenom .  If they can find that player when she's young and get her interested in their college and team, so much the better. But most athletes will not be the "greatest athlete of their generation." And, we all know of players who as sophomores are solid (but nothing special), but who become outstanding recruits by their senior year (and vice versa!)

Parents need to remember that NCAA college coaches are supposed to follow NCAA recruiting guidelines. They are not supposed to write players for recruiting purposes until the start of the junior year, and they cannot talk to players in person about recruiting until July 1 following the junior year (for Div. I coaches and June 15 for Div. II coaches). Yes, they can send out a generic questionnaire to sophomores. But that's it. They're not supposed to be telling freshmen and sophomores that they want to recruit them! Another key factor is that not all college coaches are created equal when it comes to recruiting. Some have great support staffs who can be churning out letters on a weekly basis to players. Others lumber along like dinosaurs struggling to respond to letters and tapes that came in six months ago! Some schools have identified their rising senior prospects by early summer; called them and set up visits by early September; and have the players signed by November. But, other colleges may aim to sign one player in the fall and the rest in the spring; and some sign none in the fall, waiting until after the early signing period to get serious about recruiting. And, even those coaches who want to be done by in the fall often find themselves in March, April, May or June still looking for recruits.

Since my approach to the college search centers on helping families get the best return over the long period of time with the least amount of confusion and as little duplication of effort as possible, I usually recommend following this time table.

END OF THE SOPHOMORE YEAR: If your athlete is playing on an 18/U team that goes to
Colorado, Nationals or other major tournaments, you have the option of sending out post-cards to coaches with her name/home address; team name; jersey number; grad year; position; and which tournament(s) she'll be at.

START OF THE JUNIOR YEAR: If your player is on an 18/U team or Gold team that goes to a major fall tournament that coaches attend, you again have the option of sending out the post-cards. They should also start the NCAA Clearinghouse process.

MIDDLE OF THE JUNIOR YEAR: Have her schedule the
SAT and ACT and begin to identify schools she'd like to write--encouraging her to focus on a broad range of college programs. She can also being setting her resume up on the computer and working on a letter of introduction.

SPRING OF THE JUNIOR YEAR: I consider late January to late May the opening of the best "recruiting window of opportunity." This is when I encourage players to make their skills video; and a tape made at this time should work for them all the way through the recruiting process. This is also when they should begin putting together packets to send to coaches. They can include the video or wait until it's requested, and they can let coaches know where they'll be playing over the summer. As soon as school ends, have their high school send the EC a 6th semester transcript.

START OF THE SENIOR YEAR: Families need to ensure their player is on track and keep the process moving forward. If they haven't heard back from the schools initially contacted, follow-up phone calls may be in order--particularly if they have sent a video. Seniors need to remember that no coach will give them any realistic feedback on their chances of making a college team without either having seen the video or seen the player compete in person.

Seniors need to sort colleges into three categories: the "Thanks, but no thanks" category; the "We don't know yet" category; and the "Yes, we're definitely interested and would like to talk to you, bring you in for a visit, have you apply to the school, etc." category. As the senior year progresses, the player's goal should be to constantly empty the "No" category, to move the schools in the "Maybe" category into either the "No" or "Yes" category, and to find out which schools in the "Yes" category may be a good match for her.

If families take advantage of this "window of opportunity," they are more likely to be on track throughout the process, while at the same time avoiding having to write schools three or four times to get a response. For most kids, the college search tends to be more like a marathon than a sprint. The key to winning is stamina, persistence and the ability to pace yourself. Starting at the most optimum time makes this a lot easier. Start too early and you may have repeat and repeat and repeat your efforts. Start too late, and you may miss the boat completely at a lot of schools!

 

* * *

BE SURE TO WORK FROM THE CORRECT RECRUITING "PREMISE!"

When it comes to recruiting, many families (and players) often make the mistake of assuming certain things are true. Then when their college search gets stalled or derailed, they are confused and upset. What I hear most frequently is one version or another of this simple phrase, "It's not fair!" Right there is where the problem begins. People assume or take for granted that because they think something should be a certain way, it will be. Unfortunately, that's all too often not the case. You might be lucky and find this out early enough to change your perspective. Or you might not accept it out until it's too late.

One of my goals as a recruiting consultant is to help families approach the college search from the perspective that is most likely to get them the results they want. And that means accepting right from the beginning that this process is very likely to be unfair. While it may be true that their athlete is very talented, has terrific competitive experience, is a good student and a wonderful human being, none of those things guarantees recruitment.

The above qualities may factor into her recruitment, but unfortunately, they don't guarantee that things will work out fairly or logically. The simple truth is that there are some important factors in the recruiting equation that parents can control...and some that they can't. If you understand this and work your tail off to stay of top of the things you can control, then you may be able to lessen the effect of those things you can't control. For example, your athlete can control her grades (at least to the extent that she gets the best grades she's capable of getting.) The athlete can determine how hard she works to make the most of her athletic ability--she can choose to go hang out with her friends rather than putting in extra time at the batting cages or on the mound. She can choose to play the toughest competitive schedule, and she can decide how much she hustles.

To some extent, the athlete may be able to control how she performs under pressure; parents or coaches may be able to help by encouraging the practice and drills that build confidence and help her succeed. But if she's only successful when no one is watching or when she's playing against weaker competition, and can't produce when it counts--e.g., when coaches are there to watch her--fair or not, she may have trouble convincing those coaches that she can play for them.

Families can control how well they market their player, and they can focus on the types of programs where she's most likely to be successful because these are the teams that are most likely to recruit her. But parents can moan and groan until they're blue in the face and it's not going to change the mind of a coach who just doesn't see what they see when looking at this athlete.

Parents can't control whether or not college coaches make recruiting mistakes. But they can help their college-bound player avoid making college search mistakes if they work from the correct premise. Assume that this process may not be fair, that it may be confusing and that you're not going to change the process. All you can change is your approach to it. But changing your attitude may give your athlete an edge that players who are more experienced or even more talented may lack!

* * *

PLAYING RECRUITING ROULETTE

This is a follow-up to the article that ran last month. It has to do with "playing the odds." Collegiate recruiting is a gamble in the purest sense of the word (for both the coach and the player.) Statistically speaking, the odds are that only about one in ten players who hope to make a college team will actually come up a winner after her dice are rolled.

Not all high school ball players will be dealt the same hand, of course. Coming from a strong softball area or program with high visibility will increase your odds somewhat. Having an unusual amount of talent or spectacular grades also may slant the odds in your favor.

Not all would-be college players have the same desire to play either, and the more a player really wants to play in college (because she just loves the game and can't imagine not playing), the greater are her chances of finding a team. And there are things parents and players can do to increase their chances of "winning" in the recruiting game. But many players and their families don't want to do these things...or are only willing to do them to a certain degree.

I cannot stress how important it is to identify the odds that are in your favor before you begin your college search. Recognize the "rules" you've set for yourself at the start of "play," and understand how these "rules" may affect your odds of winning. For example, if your personal "rules" state that you will be a winner if and only if you're recruited by a Top 25 Div. I team, then your odds of winning at recruiting roulette go way, way down--unless you happen to be one of the top one hundred ball players in the country. (Statistically speaking, about 75-100 kids total will be become new players at the Top 25 programs in the country every year.)

If you're willing to change your game "rules" enough to consider playing for one of the top 50 Div. I teams or one of the top 30 Div. II teams, then your odds increase somewhat because now you might only have to be among the top three hundred ball players in the country! And, of course, if you relax your "'rules" enough to talk to all good college teams that might be interested in you, then your chances of being recruited go way, way up!

Considering schools where you will be actively recruited versus making a team as a walk-on player will also drastically increase the recruiting odds in your favor. Every year I hear many girls say they're going to walk on at "Big Name" University because they're just sure (or more often their parents are just sure) they can make the team. And occasionally it does happen. But more often than not it doesn't (or if it does, the player finds out she'll be a two to four year bench-sitter and she quits). Then the player has to admit either that it really wasn't that important to her to play college ball or that she made a big mistake in choosing this school and team. Yes, we all hear about the lucky unknown who tried out for Arizona State or Oregon State or Missouri and became a starter. But what you don't hear about are all the other kids who tried out for those teams and were cut.

You should, of course, choose the college where you'll be happy and get the education you need. But if playing softball is important to you, there are many hundreds of wonderful colleges with good softball teams--but the vast majority of them are not D-I, Top Twenty programs..

One other big factor in your "odds" game is money. If you're lucky enough to have parents who will contribute financially to your college education, then your chances of finding a team and a school are significantly higher because you can choose from many, many teams. If you will only go to a school that will give you a full ride softball scholarship, your odds decrease immediately and drastically--again unless you happen to be among the top two or three percent of all the players in the country. Being able to get academic-based, minority-based or need-based financial aid may help increase your odds. But if your family is expecting or insisting that everything be paid for, you may be out of luck. Unless your family can demonstrate significant need, or you are at the very top of your class, getting a full "package" is pretty tough.

If you're asking who does win at the recruiting roulette game, the answer is actually pretty simple. The player with the odds of coming up a big winner is the ball player who passionately loves softball, has good grades, lots of motivation, an open mind, and supportive parents who understand the "realities" of winning at this game. This player will most likely be the one who will actually do everything she can to make the most of her odds. And in so doing, she will likely pass up better, more experienced players who haven't figured out how to "beat the odds!"

* * *

WHICH TRAVEL BALL AGE GROUP IS BEST FOR YOUR ATHLETE?

As recruiting becomes increasingly competitive, choosing to play for the right travel team can be a major decision for a player and her family. I won't go into the really hard part of selecting a travel team--i.e., determining up front whether or not the coaches are the best ones for you! I've given up suggesting ways (short of consulting a crystal ball) that players can determine ahead of time whether a travel ball coach is a good fit, let alone whether he or she is a) being honest (and will stay that way); b) being honest in the moment, but with little likelihood he'll be saying the same thing in six months; c) believing she is being honest, but already developing contingency plans; or d) just telling you what you want to hear.

There are two other important questions I frequently hear, however, when it comes to choosing a travel ball team. The first revolves around whether or not to play "up." Parents of high school freshmen and sophomores often ask me if I think their daughter should play 18/U or 18/Gold, particularly if it means she may not get as much playing time.

My answer to this is generally, "Yes, by all means." There are certain questions I'd ask before committing to playing "up," but it can be a great experience for a number of reasons. You should decide if this particular 18/U or Gold team is actually a better/stronger team than the best 16/U team she'd play for. Playing--even all the time--on an 18/U team that only travels to small local tournaments doesn't necessarily offer a lot of benefits. You need to find out beforehand if the team has an established track record, goes to major tournaments such as the CO Fireworks, the Rising Stars Showcase, ASA or AFA Nationals, and other well-known venues that attract a lot of college coaches. And you need to ask specific questions about what the team coaches do to help their players move on to college. You should also try to discover--if possible--whether she will really get enough playing time to help her put into practice what she's learning...at practice!

But experience has shown me that younger kids who play for established older teams often benefit in many ways. She may get excellent, experienced coaching; she should have the chance to compete with and against better players--which should make her a better player; and she'll have a year or two to see the tougher pitching (or better batters) before it has to "count." In other words, if she plays up as a freshman or sophomore, she can play part time, get used to traveling, get used to seeing college coaches everywhere, and have lots of time to adjust to a higher level of competition. If she doesn't succeed immediately, it won't hurt her because she'll be learning. And while coaches may be watching and making notes for the future, she's too young to be actively recruited yet. So there is much less pressure to perform "under pressure."

I generally see positive rather than negative results from playing "up." But it's true, not all kids are ready for this big move. If your player doesn't understand that sitting 50% of the time on a great team still offers lots of opportunities to shine and to grow as a player, then this may not be for her. If she doesn't have collegiate aspirations, there's certainly no need to play up--particularly if she would be sitting a lot. And some 15 year olds just are not socially mature enough to be spending a lot of road time with 17 and 18 year olds--or even returning college players. But overall, if I had to choose for my athlete, I'd jump at the chance to play on a good older team that welcomed her. Getting comfortable early at the top level of competition can help a player be relaxed and ready to compete when it really counts--when college coaches are there to watch her!

The second question that I hear frequently is the opposite of the first one. Time and time again parents want my assurance that it's just fine for their junior (soon to be senior) to play "down" on a 16/U team. Unfortunately, I can't respond to this question with the same enthusiasm I showed for the first one. Once in a blue moon, I'll say it's okay for a junior to play down, but for the most part, my answer is always a resounding, "DON'T!" I know, sometimes it just can't be helped. The only good team within a two-hour driving distance may be a 16/U team. Or she may not be recruited by any 18/U teams except the local rec. ball club. And of course, if your player doesn't have collegiate softball goals or is just planning on walking on at the local J.C., it's likely to be fine for her to play 16/U as a junior.

That said, however, here are the two best arguments against it. First, despite what 16/U coaches may tell you, college coaches scout far less at 16/U tournaments. Yes, some will go to 16/U ASA Nationals--though they're often there to look at the class a year behind your player's. But can you guarantee in November or March that your junior's 16/U team will go to Nationals? And yes, if your player is very strong and has done all of her college search homework--sent out letters/resumes/videos in the spring and followed up with emails and postcards--and her 16/U team goes to a major tournament like the CO Fireworks, some coaches will certainly come watch her play. But the "random discovery" factor for most 16/U players is much smaller. And, since coaches can't be in two places at once, they'll almost always choose to go where they can get the most bang for their buck.

This means if a coach has to choose between seeing a couple of the kids who've written him playing in the 16/U division or seeing 15-20 of the prospects he's considering in the18/U bracket, he'll be watching the older teams. No matter how you slice it, there's just no way coaches can spend as much time watching 16/U teams. So if you need to be seen in order to be recruited (and most kids do), your chances just aren't as good if you play down.

The second, and equally important, reason not to play down is the competition. While there are great 16/U teams and outstanding pitchers and hitters, the older kids, particularly at the Gold level, will generally be stronger. If you're a junior playing 16/U ball, you're the oldest--and theoretically--the best or most experienced. So there are not nearly as many challenges to your game. Then, all of a sudden, you have to go up to 18 or Gold in the fall of your senior year, and now you have to adjust immediately to pitching--if you're a hitter--or batters--if you're a pitcher--that your teammates have been facing for a year or two. And you may have to do this under tremendous pressure because this may be the only time college coaches get to check you out.

I can't tell a family what to do. And yes, kids do need to be happy playing softball because there's no other reason to do it. College coaches want you playing because you love the game, not because they might give you a little money. Still, you have to ask yourself, is it more important to be with my friends right now or to play college ball in two years?

It's certainly not impossible to get recruited or to find a college softball team after playing 16/U as a junior. However, I know a lot of parents who would tell you--hindsight providing 20-20 vision and all--that the biggest mistake they made with their daughter's college search was letting her play 16/U her junior summer--when she had other options. Sometimes you don't have them; and sometimes this might just be the best choice for your athlete. But if this is the route you choose to go, be sure you plan wisely, map out her college search early and thoroughly, and be prepared to hit some roadblocks along the way.

* * *

A WINNING ATTITUDE IS A BIG KEY TO BEING RECRUITED!

Many athletes and their parents will use the player's performance in game situations as an indicator of her recruitablity. If she goes three for four and makes a great diving play on a ball, they're convinced all college coaches will want to recruit her. If she goes "0" for the day and boots a couple of balls, they're sure no coach will even look at her.

The player's (and her parents') attitude towards the game is often tied to her performance. If she's hitting, fielding or pitching really well, she smiles, she's happy and her parents are ecstatic. If she has an off day, reactions can range from simply "getting down on herself" to rage and tantrums.

I have also seen cases where a player is doing very well in a game, but other team members are struggling and not "showing" as well as they would like. In this situation, parents (and occasionally the player herself) may get upset, talk about finding another team, complain about the current players and/or coaches, and create a very unpleasant environment. If you asked them why they were acting this way, they would tell you that the team's performance was hurting their player's chances for success.

Performance is important. No one would argue that a player who can't hit or field will probably not make it at the college level. And it's equally true that college coaches look for a 'clutch performance' when scouting a prospect. But just as there are many different levels of collegiate competition and many different types of college coaches, there are many levels of success among players. The "blue-chip" player, the girl in the top 1% of all players, will probably--even on a bad day--look better than a very average player does on a good day. But college coaches know that even top athletes have "off" days now and then.

When scouting, how much attention a coach pays to any given athlete may also depend a lot on whether or not the coach has a context for that player. In other words, when a coach just randomly stops at a field for five minutes to watch a team he or she doesn't know, if your player is having a really bad game, the coach will probably move on and not pay her any more attention. However, if the coach had gotten a letter from her, seen her video and liked it, and knew your player was very interested in his or her college, that coach might still take the time to watch more than one inning. He or she might even come back for another game to see if this poor performance was the result of an 'off day.'

It's also good to remember that college coaches don't just look at mechanics or skill level when recruiting athletes. Although these things are very important, most coaches also look closely at a player's attitude, work ethic, sportsmanship, and other qualities that can't be measured by 'statistics.'

It's completely normal for young adults to get discouraged, depressed or frustrated when they don't perform up to someone's expectations--whether it be their own, their parents' or their coaches'. But learning to deal with this frustration is as much a part of being a successful competitor as is learning to hit a change-up or throw a curve. Softball is a team sport and failure is just sometimes part of the game.

When recruiting, many college coaches will specifically try to look at an athlete's performance in challenging situations; and they will definitely be interested in how she copes with adversity. When the ump has an inconsistent strike zone or the team isn't playing up to its potential, coaches want to know how the individual reacts. Does she throw her bat and helmet, stomp around angrily, sit and sulk on the bench, or in other ways fail to adjust to the situation? Or does she rise to the occasion, try to keep her teammate spirits up, try to perform to her best?

Loving the game and being competitive enough to hustle even when it's ninety degrees and you're losing will tell a college coach a lot about how you will cope with the demands of college softball. In between innings if you drag your butt out to your position at shortstop and just lob balls to the first baseman, laughing when you miss a ball, this may give a college coach the impression you lack intensity or that you can't stay focused.

If you sit in the dugout and sulk when the coach pulls you for a pinch hitter or when the coach asks you to bunt, you pop up because you really want to hit away, this may tell a college coach you're not a team player and you're only interested in your own performance.

Remember, you never know when a college coach or a scout is watching you. From the time you show up at a tournament or game, you should be performing--in every sense of the word--to the best of your abilities. Whether you're just hitting soft-toss during pre-game warm-ups or making a leaping catch to save the game, coaches may be watching. When you're carrying gear after the game or sitting on the bench keeping stats for your coach, someone may be watching. And a decision to recruit or not recruit you could be based on how you handle yourself in these situations.

Finally, parents should keep in mind that the same cautions apply to you. While coaches are scouting your player, they may also be scouting you. Although it seems farfetched, I know of situations where coaches have decided not to recruit a good athlete simply because they watched her parents "act out" in the stands. The coaches saw the parents and realized the athlete would probably not fit in with their team--or at least her parents wouldn't! It may be difficult for some parents to understand, but the reality is when your athlete joins that college team, you have to say good-bye. Even if you've coached her for ten years, you will not have any input once she's in college. Where she plays, when she plays, what pitches she throws, whether she hits--these are all decisions the college coach will make without your help. And whether or not you like what the coach is doing probably won't matter a bit.

As a family, it's a good idea to talk about the emotional aspects of softball. Look at how you all handle pressure and try to gain some perspective. The more positive you can be during the tough games, the more likely you are to leave a positive impression on a coach!

* * *

SUMMER SCOUTING IMPRESSIONS

I spend most of June and July on the road, often at major tournaments like the Colorado Fireworks. This can be an exhilarating (and scary) time for players, particularly those who will start their senior year in the fall. It sure wipes me out!

Each year, I see new things and am reminded of old ones that are part of the college search for players or the recruiting process for college coaches. I'd like to mention or remind you of some of these things that might help keep you aware, motivated and on the right track during your college search.

Observations from/about College Coaches

*      They all go to big tournaments with lists. If you're not on that list, it will be very hard to get noticed unless you're hitting the ball to the fence on a regular basis--when the coaches are watching. (Sorry, but that's just the way it is.)

*      Coaches prefer that parents not approach or talk to them unless they (the coaches) have specifically requested a contact. (Parents: read the NCAA rule book and memorize the rules on contact. I see parents breaking these rules right and left--sometimes coaches too--but you may not realize your daughter's eligibility to play could be jeopardized by what you consider a harmless conversation about a college's football team.)

*      Coaches really need to know accurate grade point averages--NCAA core and cumulative--and SAT or ACT scores.

*      Almost all coaches are looking for strong, consistent hitters. Most will tell you they'd rather work to develop a player's fielding skills than have to teach her how to hit. Unless you're incredibly lucky or amazingly athletic, becoming a good hitter is a matter of learning the right mechanics (teaching your muscles what to do), developing a keen eye and teaching yourself very good discipline at the plate...and then practicing to get even better! Again, it may not be fair, but clutch hitting is what gets coaches' attention (if you're not a pitcher)!

*      When they're scouting, it's virtually impossible for coaches to differentiate between the travel ball player who sees college softball as a beginning--e.g., when she gets there, she'll work even harder, become an even better player, etc.--and the travel ball player who sees college ball as an ending--e.g., she's been doing this summer ball stuff to get a college scholarship or to get into college. As far as she's concerned, once she's there, she gets to level out and have a good time. She doesn't have to get any better. But if you ask coaches, they will all tell you it's the first type of player they really want.

*      There are way too many kids out there for coaches to see all of you. Don't assume because they're watching your game that they're there to see you. You need to show them you're motivated enough to put some effort into your college search!

*      By the end of a big tournament like the Colorado Fireworks or at the end of a series of tournaments (this year some coaches went from Phoenix, AZ to Las Vegas, NV to Kelso, WA, to Aurora, CO to Lancaster, CA in the space of a month!), coaches are bleary-eyed and exhausted. And I can guarantee you they won't remember everyone they've seen. If you want them to remember you, follow up after the tournaments with a call or email to find out if they even saw you play...and to ask where they are with recruiting.

Observations for/about Players

*      You may just be having a bad day. But a rotten attitude turns coaches off faster than anything else. If you don't want to be playing softball, don't play. (Mom and Dad will get over it--eventually.) Occasional frustration is natural and understandable. But coaches want to see if you deal with adversity in a positive or negative way. If you're struggling, don't throw your bat or helmet. Go ask for help and figure out what to do to fix the problem. If you're not performing well at the moment, focus externally and support your teammates instead of sulking and feeling sorry for yourself.

*      Weight training and running will be part of your college experience if you play softball. Don't wait until you get to college to figure this out. Start now. You'll feel better, look better, perform better and have more stamina. And you'll be way ahead of the other freshmen starting school with you!

*      College coaches really prefer to hear from you. They're not recruiting your mom or your dad or your pitching coach. No matter how scary it is, if you're not motivated enough to call coaches, talk to them, etc., they may figure you're really not that interested in playing college softball for them.

*      Don't ever just take the SAT or ACT once--unless you score a 1600 or 36 out of the gate. No matter how unpleasant it is, work to raise your score. There's way more academic money than athletic money available and coaches look for kids with high test scores.

Observations for/about Parents and Youth Coaches

*      No matter how much you would like to be playing college ball, it's not going to happen. The coaches will be recruiting your daughter or your player. If she doesn't want it, you can't make it appear that she does. Ask her on a regular basis if she's sure that playing in college is what she's wants. If it is, help her learn how to reach that goal. If it's not, let her do something she enjoys--and you can go get a life!

*      Learn the recruiting rules. And unless a coach specifically asks you to find him or her, don't approach coaches to chat about their teams or about your player. (I'm making this point twice because it's so important.) Don't jeopardize your player's eligibility and then use the excuse, 'Well, I didn't know.'

*      Find out what your daughter or player's grades really are. Learn the difference between an NCAA core GPA, a semester GPA and a cumulative GPA. This is critical information for many college coaches.

*      Support your player in a positive way. No matter how frustrating it is for you, it's ten times more so for her. Do you think she wants to be striking out???? Don't you think she'd prefer to be hitting line drives to the fence or throwing an incredible rise ball??? Your negative comments simply make things worse. They never make things better. If your player is struggling, be helpful, not hurtful. Help her determine whether her problems are mechanical or mental. If they're mechanical, then get some expert advice on how to fix them; and remember, it takes a lot of repetitions to change muscle memory. If she's in a mental slump, help her discover ways to build self-confidence, to develop discipline. Ten years from now, chances are the quality of your relationship with your daughter (or with future players if you're a coach) will be greatly improved if you leave your ego out of it and help your player learn the positive lessons softball has to teach....not the negative ones.

* * *

Why Consider Smaller Schools and Programs

 

Many people (including college coaches themselves) are surprised when I tell them that 75% of all college teams do not compete at the Div. I level. That has a very specific impact on college-bound players because it means that 75% of those who go on to play in college will be competing at a Div. II, Div. III or NAIA program.  (And this doesn't include the junior colleges.)  There are numerous good reasons to play at any of these programs, yet parents, players and many youth coaches persist in the belief that if you can't play Div. I softball, why bother?  If you talk to those young women competing for Div. II, III or NAIA schools, they'll give you lots of good reasons.  So let's look at some of the myths as to why D-I is the only way to fly!  Watching the Women's College World Series on ESPN shows you how good the competition at UCLA and Michigan and Alabama can be.  It's pretty exciting.  But remember, 64 teams out of 260 or so go to D-I regionals, and only 8 of those move on to the WCWS.   

 

Families are often surprised when they hear that many D-II teams or NAIA teams beat D-I teams when they play them in the fall.  And top D-III teams beat good D-II teams as well.  One thing is certain.  Not all teams are created equal at any level of competition.  Just as there are D-III or D-II teams that struggle to be competitive, there are also D-I teams that do the same.  Athletic funding really varies from school to school, and the commitment to hiring top-notch coaches, providing state of the art facilities, and so on, is just as likely to be present (or absent) at an NAIA school as it is as a Division I college.

 

Realistically, how many players will go on to professional careers in softball or make it to the Olympics?  (Maybe 1 percent.)  Dreams are great, but it's your life after college that college is supposed to be about.  Where you get your degree, what kind of education you get, how good your grades are, and the completeness of your collegiate experience should determine what schools you consider, and not whether the team is D-I or D-III.

 

Many parents are somewhat surprised and disappointed to find out that there are D-I teams that are only moderately competitive, and that many D-I schools are not fully funded--e.g., instead of having 12 scholarships, they have 2 or 5 or 7.  Yes, if you are recruited by a top D-I team, you may be offered more scholarship money than if you choose a D-II or NAIA program, but what if you're not necessarily a top 2% prospect?  You might find that a Div. II or NAIA school puts together a better package based on academics or need or other factors than a smaller D-I school could offer you.  While there is probably more money available overall at the Div. I level, the fact still remains that 75% of all college players will not be playing at D-I schools.

 

Something else you have to consider is what you want your college experience to consist of.  Do you want to take part in student government, perform with the theater or music department, play another sport, do internships or research projects?  It may be next to impossible to do any of this while competing at a nationally ranked D-I program.  Are you thinking of graduate school, maybe law or medicine, after college?  When you apply, they'll look at your GPA and your MCAT or LSAT scores.  Softball experience will look nice on your resume, but it will not get you into a top law school.  It really may be better for you to have a particular undergraduate academic experience instead of a certain athletic experience if you want to achieve your future goals.

 

Or perhaps you're at the other end of the spectrum.  You're a great athlete who's being pursued by major university teams.  But you have to work very hard to get C's and B's, and just getting into college will be a big achievement.  While many D-I programs have excellent academic support systems, the demands of 65 or more games a year, conditioning, practices, road trips, etc., may make it difficult for you to succeed in the classroom without constantly feeling overwhelmed.  You might want to consider a smaller school, where student-teacher ratios are 20-1, and where you will be helped to succeed by professors who know who you and can keep you on top of your academic game as well as your athletic one.  You might play only 40 games a season, but be more successful and much less stressed!

 

I always recommend prospective college players go watch top D-III teams, strong NAIA and D-II programs compete whenever possible.  They're often surprised by how good these teams are.  And if they look good, and they want you, why not listen to what the coach has to say?  Looking back five or six years from now, you might find that you played for a top team, got a great education, and thoroughly enjoyed every aspect of your college experience which included, but wasn't limited to playing softball and going to class!

 

* * *

 

Happy?  Miserable? Happy? Miserable?  What Works For Your Daughter?

 

Throughout the year, I get periodic emails and phone calls from parents describing how unhappy their daughter is on her college team.  She may love the school, like the players, etc., but she’s not getting playing time, and she’s heartbroken.  When the coach recruited her, he or she created a glowing picture of how it was going to be once she was there.  But the reality is completely different.  Parents want to know what they can do, why does this happen, what are her options, etc.?

 

In order to help prevent this from happening to your daughter, let me suggest a few things to consider ahead of time.  Then I’ll look at a couple of ways you might handle this situation if it does come up.

 

BEFORE SHE CHOOSES A COLLEGE

 

When a coach is recruiting a player, he wants to present the best case scenario for the prospect.   Some coaches paint glowing pictures that make it sound like all your daughter has to do is show up and she’ll be the #3 hitter, batting .400 as a freshman.  Other coaches are cautiously optimistic, telling her that if she works hard and develops as they hope, she should get lots of playing time.  A third group of coaches may be bluntly honest (particularly if they see your daughter as a role player or if she’s considering walking on at their schools.)  They may be very straightforward and tell her she’ll have to work hard to get a chance to contribute, and that there are no guarantees.

 

But it almost doesn’t matter what they really say!  Most families will hear what they want to hear.  And that means they expect their daughter will play—even when the coach indicates it could well be otherwise.   Thus the disappointment of sitting the bench can be crushing, for both parents and child.

 

Coupled with this is a (frequently) first time sense of powerlessness.  In the past, if things didn’t work out on a given team, parents might have confronted the coaches, perhaps complained loudly in the stands, and often ended up finding another team.  But you can’t do that in college.  (Well, you can complain loudly in the stands, but that’s about all.)  And in fact, interference from a parent generally makes the situation worse.

 

So how do you avoid this?  Honestly, sometimes you can’t.  If your player just doesn’t make the jump to college level competition as you expected, she may find herself on the bench.  You can come up with fifty reasons why she’s only hitting .098 or her ERA is 12.10, but you’re not the one stepping into the batter’s box or setting up on the pitching rubber.  If she doesn’t produce, she probably doesn’t play. 

 

I know I’ll get internet tomatoes thrown at me by parents who insist that their child can play for UCLA or Tennessee if just given the chance, that she is an Olympic caliber player, and so on.  But consider this.  Since 98-99% of all kids will be done as serious softball players once they graduate college, wouldn’t you rather see your child spend that four years actually PLAYING—even if it’s on a lesser-known team?

 

Most parents would deny that they’d rather see their kid unhappy on a big name team they can brag about than see her happy and successful on a smaller team that none of their buddies have heard of.  But if my experience counts for anything (and it should), there are quite a few parents whose behavior indicates this is actually how they feel.  (At least this is how they feel before she goes to that bigger program and is miserable.)

 

If you want to avoid having to deal with a player who’s sitting the bench and hating life, there are a few things you can do when choosing a college. 

 

1.      Ask the right questions, and really listen to the answers.  See how many other players are currently on that team or have been recruited to fill your daughter’s likely college position.  If there are already 3 kids who can play catcher, chances are your daughter will have to fight for a spot.  That pressure is more than you can imagine…trust me.

2.      Don’t assume the bigger program is the better program—for your daughter anyway.   Yes, it might be fun to tell other parents that Suzy is at a big name college.  But again, trust me when I tell you it won’t be fun when they ask you how she’s doing and you have to tell them (or figure out how to avoid telling them) that she’s sitting the bench or she’s hitting .102, or worse, that she hates softball now.

3.      Don’t put a dollar value on her playing experience.  Yes, it’s great to get the most money you can.  But is that money really worth it if she’s miserable?  There are loans, jobs, grants and various ways to pay for college.  If she wasn’t playing softball at all, you’d still have to figure out how to cover her expenses.  Would you rather borrow $3000 a year or forego that new car for a couple of years so that your daughter can love every minute of her college softball experience?  Or do you prefer to sell her happiness for $20000, for $10000, for $5000?  And keep in mind that changing colleges may end up costing you more than you ever got in scholarship dollars if she hates it there and wants to come home.

 

For my money, the happiest college players are usually kids at D-III programs.  They aren’t getting a dime of athletic money.  And it’s amazing how many of them love softball more now than they did in high school. 

 

Be smart.  Look at the experience of the kids sitting the bench versus that of those playing somewhere else.  Consider lots of options and be honest with yourself about your financial needs versus your ego needs.  Assess each school your athlete is considering, making sure you understand the worst case scenario.  If your daughter can be happy with this, then you’re probably okay. 

ONCE SHE’S ATTENDING A COLLEGE

We all make mistakes.  Athletes do sometimes choose teams and colleges for the wrong reasons, and that’s just part of life.  If you find yourself in a situation where your daughter is very unhappy because she’s not playing, you do have some options.  This applies mostly to players who are in their sophomore year because it’s not unusual for freshmen to sit.  And, assuming the college itself is a good fit, I believe players should give a school at least one year to see if the situation improves.  But by the time she’s well into her sophomore year, it should be apparent whether or not she’s going to have a chance to play. 

 

If she’s sitting the bench and is truly miserable, but doesn’t want to give up softball, there are a few things she can do.

 

1.      The player, not the parent, should go talk to the coach.  Don’t do it before or after a game; pick a quiet time.  Don’t approach the coach in a confrontational way.   Simply ask the coach to be honest about why you’re not playing, what you might work on to improve your skills, and what it would take for you to get the playing time you want.

2.      If the coach makes sound suggestions, act on them.  If it means more time in the weight room or in the batting cage, do it.  Work twice as hard as any other player on the team, and show the coach how much you want it.  If you do everything the coach recommends, and things don’t improve, you will have a very legitimate reason to consider leaving.

3.      If either the coach indicates you’re never likely to be more than a role player, or, you do everything the coach asked for and still don’t get any more playing time, parents and player will have to sit down and decide how important softball is.   If the player is happy at the college, maybe it’s time to put down the bat and glove.  Even if it means giving up a scholarship, she can finish her education and move on with her adult life.

4.      If, after some serious thinking and family discussions, the player decides she wants to find a school where she can be a contributing player, do it the right way.  The player or her parents can’t just pick up the phone and start calling coaches.  She will have to talk to her coach, ask for her release, and assuming that it’s granted, she can then start contacting colleges.

 

But don’t make the same mistake twice. Understand that transferring will probably mean that mom and dad have to pay for school, at least for awhile.  The player may find she still has to prove herself once she gets to a new program.  So be smart.  Look for a team where she can realistically make an immediate impact.  After all, there’s no point in transferring only to sit the bench again.

 

For most players, this may mean going to a different kind of team.  It doesn’t necessarily mean the team won’t be a good one, however.  A player sitting the bench at a mid-level D-I team might be able to start right away at a good D-II or NAIA team.  In some cases, the player might have to go to a smaller, less competitive program, but remember, it’s all about the playing time.

 

If you’re smart and lucky, you will choose wisely out of high school.  Finding the right team is always about more than the dollar and the name.  Re-arrange your priorities if necessary.  Finding a team where you can contribute as a freshman (or definitely by the time you’re a sophomore) should be higher on the list than either the affiliation or the scholarship!

 

* * *

 

© Collegiate Softball Connection 2012